Continuing the non-descript colours theme from my last post, the Siberian Chiffchaff has featured on this blog before, along with a
summary of the heated debate which rages about the ability of the
tristis sub-species to be identified safely on field views and/or call by those of us without a DNA testing lab. The debate took a twist recently when a Chiffchaff ringed at Portland Bill, which looked like a
tristis, and which proved to be genetically the same as a
tristis when tested by someone with a DNA testing lab, called like a normal
collybita Chiffchaff. I have attempted to summarise the complex and subtle scientific debate which ensued below in non-technical terms as it's quite difficult to keep up with, best read as a follow-up from my earlier post:
Expert 2: Nah nah nah, told you so.
Expert 1: That proves nothing.
Expert 2: See that Chiffchaff poo that was DNA tested? That's your dad that is.
Expert 1: Is not.
Anyway, some photos below of what I suppose I should call a 'presumed' Siberian Chiffchaff as it remained stubbornly silent, despite me humming my full repertoire of Siberian folk songs to make it feel at home.
|
Siberian Chiffchaff, Portland Castle |
|
The bird looking very grey and white in side profile |
|
The same bird looking a bit more olive toned in lower light - it spent some time feeding on the ground |
|
A nice view in the open |
|
And finally a 'normal' Chiffchaff taken in the same place for comparison |
I'd love to see the humble Robin in all it Christmas glory if you run across.
ReplyDeleteHappy Holidays and happy winter hunting